|
September 29, 2007
Filed Under (Parliament of One) by Mad Morten
Before we begin: From hereon I’m using the name “Burma†for the country that on many maps is named “Myanmar.†The name “Myanmar†was imposed by the current military dictatorship and is not the country’s true name.
Much time passed and the world changed. Every now and again, I’d check in with Amnesty International only to see that Suu Kyi was still under house arrest and the military junta was still in control in the country. Other atrocities were played out on the world stage, countries were invaded, UN sanctions were engaged, embargoes were put in place, yet somehow Burma crept under the radar and the military rulers were left free to do what they wanted with the people they were holding hostage. Then a couple of weeks ago a YouTube video dropped into my inbox. In it actor Jim Carrey talked about Aung San Suu Kyi and her plight, urging the world to take action. To me this was not news but reading the comments on the video page, I was astounded to note that almost no one knew about this woman and her story, let alone the plight of the Burmese people. And slowly a realization started to materialize: Burma is of no value to the big western powers like the United States. They have no vested interests in the country, there is no oil or other resources there and they pose no threat to western interests. So unlike Iraq, Iran, China or North Korea, Burma is irrelevant. Well, not entirely irrelevant. It would turn out this week that Burma is an excellent decoy. The last two weeks have seen a dramatic turn of events in this forgotten conflict. After its government quintupled gas prices, the people of Burma took to the streets in protest. The protesters were largely Buddhist monks and the protests themselves were non-violent. This is not the first time such protests have occurred but the military dictatorship imposes extreme restrictions on both national and world media, so such news in the past have never reached the outside world. But with the explosive growth of blogs and video sharing sites like YouTube, bloggers, citizen journalists and organizations started documenting the events and sharing them over the internet. As a result, the images of tens of thousands of orange robed monks walking the streets of Burma started appearing on computer screens and eventually on broadcast news all over the world. And just like that, the plight of the Burmese people and their jailed Prime Minister Aung San Suu Kyi became a hot political potato. In a bizarre twist of fate, the escalation of the military dictatorship’s response to the protests coincided with Monday’s meeting in the United Nations, giving US President George W. Bush a valid excuse to ignore the speech from Iranian President Mahmod Ahmadinajad and the disastrous war in Iraq to focus instead on a real problem that needed to be solved immediately. And with that, due almost entirely to circumstance, the Burma situation became front page news all over the western world, in no small part thanks to the efforts of citizen journalists and brave bloggers. And it’s about time. The question now is what happens next? The military dictatorship in Burma seems set on beating down the opposition with any means necessary. On Wednesday the military opened fire on the demonstrators, killing hundreds. For some unknown reason, the blatant killing of famed Japanese war journalist Kenji Nagais – an act which is heavily covered in Asia and Europe and which was documented by several cameramen – has been largely blacked out in North American media. The news outlets seem more concerned about covering the non-existent nuclear standoff between Iran and the US than the real battle being fought in the streets of Burma between unarmed civilians and an army with shoot-to-kill orders. So even with President Bush’s speech on Monday, it is unclear whether the US is willing to invest any more effort into finding a lasting solution. In the meantime, the people of Burma keep up the good fight against a military that has ruled them with an iron fist since 1962 and Aung San Suu Kyi remains under house arrest unavailable to her people and unable to stop the impending bloodshed. So, if this story upsets you (and it should), please take the time to share it with people you know, learn more about the situation in Burma through the Human Rights Action Center and the US Campaign for Burma and get involved! You can also join the Facebook group Support the Monks’ protest in Burma where you’ll find up-to-date information on the situation and the organizations that are working for the Burmese people. We can no longer sit idly by and watch this situation deteriorate. 2 Responses to “Parliament of One: Burma / Myanmar – The Atrocity the World Ignored”Leave a Reply |
|
September 29th, 2007 at 9:55 am
Anug San Suu Kyi’s connection with the CIA (thru our intelops like DIA officer Col. Robert Helvey) and the Karen insurgency is an open secret:
http://www.google.com/search?q=Aung+San+Suu+Kyi+Robert+Helvey
http://www.google.com/search?q=Aung+San+Suu+Kyi+Karen+insurgency
And is it a big suprise all this ties back to the American Enterprise Institute, the chief architect of the Iraq war:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Albert_Einstein_Institution
“Helvey “was an officer of the Defence Intelligence Agency of the Pentagon, who had served in Vietnam and, subsequently, as the US Defence Attache in Yangon, Myanmar (1983 to 85), during which he clandestinely organised the Myanmarese students to work behind Aung San Suu Kyi and in collaboration with Bo Mya’s Karen insurgent groupâ€
Here’s more background on Col Robert Helvey and CIA’s agenda to employ non-violent warfare to destablize other countries (the organge/velvet revolutions being the most recent examples):
http://www.saag.org/papers2/paper198.htm
October 1st, 2007 at 3:01 pm
A reply to Charles Liu:
Although I am usually a fierce opponent of the US (or CIAs) involvement / meddling in foreign affairs, in this case I’d have to say it’s still better than the alternative.
The CIA and US track record in this respect is quite grim but in this specific case you have to look at the alternative. Regardless of whether Suu Kyi is funded by the CIA or not, she stands for principles that are universal and should be implemented everywhere: Free speech, individual rights and a democratic leadership. If she stood for overtly Americanized values or was another form of dictator I would say otherwise but in this singular case I have to say your criticism is misplaced.
After all we are talking about replacing a violent military dictatorship here. It’s not like the monks are trying to topple a friendly law abiding people loving regime. These people are ruthless killers.
Mad Morten